Why the study?
Enrolling young children unable to give informed consent into OTOF-gene therapy trials raises ethical considerations regarding the balance of benefits and risks compared to cochlear implants.
This article outlines the ethical considerations and responsible approaches for enrolling young children in OTOF-gene therapy trials for profound deafness.
OTOF -gene therapy for profound deafness in children has entered clinical trials. Given that there is an approved alternative therapy with cochlear implants, it is imperative to scrutinize the risks, while also highlighting the novel benefits, of this experimental gene therapy. Since the untreated inner ear subsequently degenerates in this form of inherited deafness, the OTOF -gene therapy will be most effective in young children. Moreover, the best outcome in terms of hearing and speech comprehension is expected when the gene therapy is applied before the age of 3 years. Given such “earlier the better” considerations, the optimal time for these clinical trials and this particular therapy is at an age when children are too young to give informed consent. Enrolling children, which are a vulnerable category of persons, in clinical trials where the balance of benefits and risks is uncertain, raises a series of ethical considerations. In this article, we outline how this research can be pursued in an ethically responsible manner.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reisinger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: