Why the study?
Does a past medical history of hypertension, stroke, or myocardial infarction increase the risk of colorectal cancer death in Japanese adults aged 40-79 years?
Does a past medical history of hypertension, stroke, or myocardial infarction increase the risk of colorectal cancer death in Japanese adults aged 40-79 years?
A history of hypertension and myocardial infarction is associated with a significantly increased risk of rectal cancer death in women.
May signal higher rectal cancer mortality risk in women with hypertension or MI history; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Host factors expressed by individual past medical history of hypertension, stroke, and myocardial infarction may have a relationship with colorectal cancer. METHODS: As part of the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study (JACC Study) for the Evaluation of Cancer Risk sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (Monbusho), we conducted a follow-up study of 110,792 Japanese inhabitants aged 40-79 years to reveal the relationship of past medical history of hypertension, stroke, and myocardial infarction at the baseline in 1988-1990 with colorectal cancer death for about 10 years up to the end of 1999. RESULTS: Past medical history of hypertension associated with an increased risk of female rectal cancer when analyzing all cancer cases with adjustment for age, body mass index, and exercise (hazard ratio [HR]=1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.13-3.43). Past medical history of myocardial infarction was also an increased risk for female rectal cancer (HR=3.05, 95% CI; 1.28-7.28). Females who had a medical history of stroke had increased risk of rectal cancer without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: There was a positive association of past medical history of hypertension and myocardial infarction and an increased risk of rectal cancer in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: