Key result
New-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft was associated with an increased long-term risk of stroke (adjusted effect size 1.25; 95% CI 1.09-1.42; P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft increase the long-term risk of stroke in patients without prior atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis (n=108,711)
Does new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft increase the long-term risk of stroke in patients without prior atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: Adjusted effect size 1.25 (95% CI 1.09-1.42)
p-value: p=0.001
New-onset atrial fibrillation after CABG is associated with a significantly increased long-term risk of stroke, suggesting a potential need for anticoagulation strategies in this population.
NOAF after CABG signals higher long-term stroke risk; supports extended surveillance but leaves optimal antithrombotic strategy open.
Background New‐onset atrial fibrillation ( NOAF ) after coronary artery bypass graft is related to an increased short‐term risk of stroke and mortality. We investigated whether the long‐term risk of stroke is increased. Methods and Results We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies that included patients who had coronary artery bypass graft and who afterwards developed NOAF during their index admission; these patients did not have previous atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome was risk of stroke at 6 months or more in patients who developed NOAF compared with those who did not. Odds ratios, relative risk, and hazard ratios were considered equivalent; outcomes were pooled on the log‐ratio scale using a random‐effects model and reported as exponentiated effect‐sizes. We included 16 studies, comprising 108 711 participants with a median follow‐up period of 2.05 years. Average participant age was 66.8 years, with studies including an average of 74.8% males. There was an increased long‐term risk of stroke in the presence of NOAF (unadjusted studies effect‐sizes=1.36, 95% confidence interval, 1.12–1.65, P =0.001, adjusted studies effect‐sizes=1.25, 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.42, P =0.001). There was evidence of moderate effect variation because of heterogeneity in studies reporting unadjusted ( P =0.021, I 2 =49.8%) and adjusted data ( P =0.081, I 2 =49.1%), and publication bias in the latter group (Egger's test, P =0.031). Sensitivity analysis on unadjusted data by study quality, design, and surgery did not alter the effect direction. Conclusions Presence of NOAF in patients post–coronary artery bypass graft is associated with increased long‐term risk of stroke compared with patients without NOAF . Further studies may show whether the increased risk is mediated by atrial fibrillation and whether anticoagulation reduces risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Megens et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Post-coronary artery bypass graft (n=108,711). New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) vs. No new-onset atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Risk of stroke at 6 months or more (Adjusted effect size 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.42, p=0.001). New-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft was associated with an increased long-term risk of stroke (adjusted effect size 1.25; 95% CI 1.09-1.42; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: