Key result
A practice improvement intervention to increase surgical safety checklist participation did not significantly change procedural delays (36.8 vs 38.7 minutes; p=0.428).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to describe changes in day of surgery cancellations and procedural delays following an intervention to improve surgical safety checklist participation.
Does a practice improvement intervention to improve surgical safety checklist participation reduce day of surgery cancellations and procedural delays in patients undergoing elective surgeries?
Observational (n=33,017)
Does a practice improvement intervention to improve surgical safety checklist participation reduce day of surgery cancellations and procedural delays in patients undergoing elective surgeries?
Increased participation in the surgical safety checklist does not increase procedural delays or negatively impact clinical efficiencies.
Should not yet change perioperative practice; leaves open checklist efficacy in larger trials.
Objective: To describe changes in day of surgery (DOS) cancellations and procedural delays following introduction of a practice improvement intervention to improve team members’ participation in the surgical safety checklist (SSC). Methods: Pretest—posttest electronic audit of secondary data collected 12 months before and 12 months after implementation. A consecutive sample of patients who underwent elective surgeries were included. Elective surgeries over two periods (November 2014 to September 2015, and November 2015 to October 2016) were included in the audit and data was collected retrospectively. The practice improvement intervention coined ‘pass the baton’ was implemented over four weeks in October 2015. Results: Across audit periods 33 017 surgical procedures (16 262 pretest and 16 755 posttest) were performed. DOS cancellations between phases totalled 826 with an increase of 112 in the posttest phase with the largest posttest increase being in suite cancellation (increase of 97). Across phases, there were 1508 procedural delays (pretest n=737, posttest n =771), with the most frequent delay being due to staff availability (p=0.577). Pretest procedural delays averaged 38.7 minutes (SD 52.4) and posttest averaged 36.8 minutes (SD 43.2) (p=0.428). Conclusions: These results suggest no change in clinical efficiencies when the SSC is fully utilised. That is, increased participation in the checklist does not increase delays in surgery. When considering ways to improve clinical efficiency, hospital administrators need to consider skill mix, physical layout of the OR and additional staffing, factors not captured in routine clinical audit data collected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gillespie et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Elective surgeries (n=33,017). Practice improvement intervention ('pass the baton') for surgical safety checklist vs. Pretest period was evaluated on Procedural delays (minutes) (p=0.428). A practice improvement intervention to increase surgical safety checklist participation did not significantly change procedural delays (36.8 vs 38.7 minutes; p=0.428).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: