Key result
Overexpression of DDAH I in NO-deficient C6 gliomas had no measurable NO-independent effect on tumour growth, vessel density, function, or maturation.
Why the study?
Does DDAH I overexpression improve tumour vascular development and growth in female NCr nude mice with C6 glioma xenografts?
Does DDAH I overexpression improve tumour vascular development and growth in female NCr nude mice with C6 glioma xenografts?
In a glioma model, DDAH I overexpression did not independently affect tumour growth or angiogenesis when NO production was absent, indicating its therapeutic potential relies on NO regulation.
DDAH I shows no NO-independent effects on glioma angiogenesis; leaves open whether DDAH targeting offers benefit beyond NO modulation.
Nitric oxide (NO) has been strongly implicated in glioma progression and angiogenesis. The endogenous inhibitors of NO synthesis, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), are metabolized by dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH), and hence, DDAH is an intracellular factor that regulates NO. However, DDAH may also have an NO-independent action. We aimed to investigate whether DDAH I has any direct role in tumour vascular development and growth independent of its NO-mediated effects, in order to establish the future potential of DDAH inhibition as an anti-angiogenic treatment strategy. A clone of rat C6 glioma cells deficient in NO production expressing a pTet Off regulatable element was identified and engineered to overexpress DDAH I in the absence of doxycycline. Xenografts derived from these cells were propagated in the presence or absence of doxycycline and susceptibility magnetic resonance imaging used to assess functional vasculature in vivo. Pathological correlates of tumour vascular density, maturation and function were also sought. In the absence of doxycycline, tumours exhibited high DDAH I expression and activity, which was suppressed in its presence. However, overexpression of DDAH I had no measurable effect on tumour growth, vessel density, function or maturation. These data suggest that in C6 gliomas DDAH has no NO-independent effects on tumour growth and angiogenesis, and that the therapeutic potential of targeting DDAH in gliomas should only be considered in the context of NO regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papaevangelou et al. (2018) studied Glioma (n=28). DDAH I overexpression vs. Endogenous DDAH I expression (suppressed by doxycycline) was evaluated on Tumour growth rate and functional vasculature (fractional blood volume and R2* by MRI). Overexpression of DDAH I in NO-deficient C6 gliomas had no measurable NO-independent effect on tumour growth, vessel density, function, or maturation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: