Key result
Continuous IV labetalol matches nicardipine and nitroprusside for rapid blood pressure reduction in young children.
Why the study?
The efficacy and safety of intravenous labetalol for hypertensive crisis in children 24 months of age or younger needed to be determined.
Does continuous intravenous labetalol infusion reduce systolic blood pressure in children ≤ 24 months of age with hypertensive crisis compared to nicardipine or nitroprusside?
Observational (n=27)
No
Does continuous intravenous labetalol infusion reduce systolic blood pressure in children ≤ 24 months of age with hypertensive crisis compared to nicardipine or nitroprusside?
Continuous intravenous labetalol is efficacious and generally safe for treating hypertensive crisis in children ≤ 24 months, though caution is needed in those with brain injury due to hypotension risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports continuous labetalol for rapid BP reduction in hypertensive infants; leaves open randomized confirmation of comparative efficacy and safety.
Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of labetalol for hypertensive crisis in children ≤ 24 months of age. Design Retrospective chart review. Statistical analysis utilized analysis of variance for continuous data, chi-square tests for nominal data, and linear regression. Setting A 737-bed pediatric teaching institution. Patients Twenty-seven patients ≤ 24 months of age were treated with 37 intravenous infusions of labetalol, nicardipine, or nitroprusside for hypertensive crisis or hypertensive urgency. Interventions None. Measurements and main results The primary end point consisted of time to 20% reduction in systolic blood pressure. Primary safety end points measured the prevalence of deleterious effects of labetalol. Continuous infusion of labetalol reduced mean systolic blood pressure by at least 20% in < 8 hrs. This effect was similar to nicardipine and nitroprusside infusions. The reported side effects were similar in each group. Patients receiving labetalol and presenting with ischemic or traumatic brain injury were likely to develop hypotension requiring infusion discontinuation. Conclusions Continuous intravenous labetalol infusion is efficacious for treatment of hypertensive crisis in children ≤ 24 months of age. Aside from patients presenting with ischemic or traumatic brain injury, labetalol was safe to use in this population for hypertensive emergencies and had a satisfactory adverse effect profile. Labetalol may reach dose saturation at a much lower dose in young children in comparison to adults. Clinicians should use caution when initiating labetalol infusions in young patients with brain injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Hypertensive crisis or hypertensive urgency (n=27). Intravenous labetalol vs. Intravenous nicardipine or nitroprusside was evaluated on Time to 20% reduction in systolic blood pressure. Continuous intravenous labetalol reduced mean systolic blood pressure by ≥20% in <8 hours in children ≤24 months, similar to nicardipine and nitroprusside.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: