Why the study?
Can rapid simultaneous biplane stereoscopic angiocardiography differentiate pure mitral stenosis from mitral stenosis with regurgitation or predict the degree of stenosis?
Can rapid simultaneous biplane stereoscopic angiocardiography differentiate pure mitral stenosis from mitral stenosis with regurgitation or predict the degree of stenosis?
Angiocardiographic intracardiac circulation times and opacification patterns do not reliably differentiate pure mitral stenosis from mixed mitral valve disease or predict stenosis severity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Angiocardiographic parameters should not guide mitral valve differentiation; leaves open whether contemporary imaging can reliably assess stenosis severity.
Intracardiac flow of intravenously injected radiopaque material was studied by means of rapid simultaneous biplane stereoscopic angiocardiography. Intracardiac circulation times thus determined may be found useful in recognizing structural abnormality and in detecting changes in cardiac function. In mitral stenosis, a distinctive, but not specific, pattern was recognized whether or not mitral valvotomy had been performed. No relationship was found between left atrial size and left atrial circulation time or between the degree of opacification of the left atrium and that of the left ventricle to differentiate "pure" mitral stenosis from mitral stenosis with regurgitation as diagnosed at the time of surgery or to predict the degree of mitral stenosis reported by the surgeon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soloff et al. (1956) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: