Why the study?
Does an alternative approach using a biventricular pulsatile flow pump and blood substitute reduce brain and lung damage compared to conventional CABG?
Does an alternative approach using a biventricular pulsatile flow pump and blood substitute reduce brain and lung damage compared to conventional CABG?
This review proposes an alternative perfusion strategy using a biventricular pulsatile flow pump and blood substitute to potentially mitigate the cognitive decline and organ damage associated with conventional CABG.
Does not support changing CABG perfusion practices; hypothesis-generating proposal for pulsatile flow with blood substitutes to reduce cognitive and organ injury.
The development of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) for the treatment of coronary heart disease has resulted in reduced morbidity and mortality compared with medical therapy. Even with the rapid development of improved percutaneous interventions, CABG remains an important approach for treating patients with advanced coronary heart disease. However, recent studies and commentary reporting an alarmingly high incidence of subtle, cognitive decline following CABG have generated questions about whether these adverse outcomes could be lessened. Even after considerable study, there is no consensus as to the cause of brain and lung injury after CABG and cardiopulmonary bypass, nor an agreed upon, mechanistic approach to study its prevention. The potential causes of these adverse outcomes and a simple approach are described, involving the use of the cannulae, biventricular pulsatile flow pump, and a blood substitute to optimize the perfusion of brain and alveolar cells, minimize systemic microembolization, and limit post-CABG cognitive decline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Runge et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: