Key result
Ethanol consumption in monkeys markedly increased the production and mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells, but decreased their ability to form capillaries (p < 0.05).
Why the study?
Does ethanol consumption affect the production, mobilization, and vasculogenesis potential of EPCs in nonhuman primates?
Does ethanol consumption affect the production, mobilization, and vasculogenesis potential of EPCs in nonhuman primates?
Chronic ethanol consumption in nonhuman primates increases endothelial progenitor cell mobilization but impairs their functional capacity for vasculogenesis.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Vasculogenesis is essential to the preservation and repair of damaged or diseased vessels. Alcohol is the most commonly abused drug among young adults, but its effects on vessel growth and repair are unknown. The basis of vascular repair is endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) recruitment to assist in the formation of new vascular network (vasculogenesis). Therefore, the objective of this study was to measure the effects of ethanol consumption on the production, mobilization and vasculogenesis potential EPCs in nonhuman primates. METHODS: Four to five year-old (young adult) male rhesus monkeys consumed monkey chow and water (Control, n = 7), or chow and water + ethanol (Alcohol, 2.45 g/d, n = 7) for 12 months. Peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples were collected for fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis of cell surface antigens (CD45, CD31, CD44, CD133, VEGF-R2 - or KDR); and for capillary formation on Matrigel-coated plates. RESULTS: There were greater numbers of nonhematopoeitic stromal cells (CD45-) and putative mesenchymal progenitor cells (CD45-/CD44+) in the PB and BM of Alcohol versus Control monkeys (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were greater numbers of EPCs (CD45-/CD133+/KDR+) in the BM and PB of Alcohol versus Control monkeys (p < 0.05). However, the EPCs of Alcohol monkeys were less likely to form capillaries on matrigel-coated plates than Control monkeys (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ethanol consumption in monkeys markedly increased the production and mobilization of EPCs, but decreased their ability to form capillaries. The pathophysiologic consequences of such effects are unclear, but may represent an ethanol-induced chronic stress on the BM, resulting in EPC.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ethanol may impair EPC-mediated repair despite mobilization in primates; leaves open translation to human vascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2007) studied this question. Ethanol vs. Water (Control) was evaluated on Capillary formation on matrigel-coated plates (p=<0.05). Ethanol consumption in monkeys markedly increased the production and mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells, but decreased their ability to form capillaries (p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: