This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Generalized thyroid hormone resistance (GTHR) is a disorder of thyroid hormone action that we have previously shown to be tightly linked to one of the two thyroid hormone receptor genes, c-erbA,8, in a single kindred, A. We now show that in two other kindreds, B and D, with differing phenotypes, there is also linkage between c-erbAft and GTHR. The combined maximum logarithm of the odds score for all three kindreds at a recombination fraction of 0 was 5.77. In vivo studies had shown a triiodothyronine (T3)-binding affinity abnormality in nuclear receptors of kindred A, and we therefore investigated the defect in c-erbA,8 in this kindred by sequencing a major portion of the T3-binding domain in the 3'-region of fibroblast c-erbAfl cDNA and leukocyte c-erbAf genomic DNA. A base substitution, cytosine to adenine, was found at cDNA position 1643 which altered the proline codon at position 448 to a histi- dine. By allelic-specific hybridization, this base substitution was found in only one allele of seven affected members, and not found in 10 unaffected members of kindred A, as expected for a dominant disease. Also, this altered base was not found in kindreds B or D, or in 92 random c-erbA,8 alleles. These re- sults and the fact that the mutation is predicted to alter the secondary structure of the crucial T3-binding domain of the c-erbAft receptor suggest this mutation is an excellent candi- date for the genetic cause of GTHR in kindred A. Different mutations in the c-erbAfl gene are likely responsible for the variant phenotypes of thyroid hormone resistance in kindreds B and D. (J. Clin. Invest. 1990.85:93-100.) linkage -candidate mutationproline codon 448 * histidinetriiodothyronine-binding domain Introduction Generalized thyroid hormone resistance (GTHR)' refers to a syndrome characterized by elevated circulating levels of free thyroid hormones, resistance to thyroid hormone action, and inappropriately normal or elevated levels of thyroid-stimulat-
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Usala et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: