Key result
The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for metabolic syndrome in obese women, with an area under the curve of 0.832.
Why the study?
Traditional anthropometric indices may inadequately distinguish obese individuals with low metabolic risk or who are metabolically healthy, prompting the evaluation of novel indices for diagnostic accuracy.
Do novel anthropometric indices accurately identify metabolic syndrome and metabolic risk factors in obese women?
Cross-Sectional (n=292)
No
Do novel anthropometric indices accurately identify metabolic syndrome and metabolic risk factors in obese women?
The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index and visceral adiposity index (VAI) are effective novel anthropometric markers for identifying metabolic syndrome in obese women.
Novel indices may better identify MetS than traditional measures; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Aims: Traditional anthropometric indices may be inadequate for distinguishing obese individuals with low metabolic risk or those who are metabolically healthy. Therefore, newer, innovative indices may offer improved diagnostic accuracy. Current study aims to evaluate effectiveness of both traditional and novel anthropometric indices in identifying metabolic syndrome (MetS) and assessing metabolic risk factors such serum uric acid (SUA) and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP). Methods: This was a retrospective study involving data of 292 obese women. The patients were separated into groups according to presence of MetS and their SUA and AIP levels. Predictive power was estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves, by comparing the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Our results showed that all novel indices except the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) had potential utility in diagnosing MetS. The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index had the highest AUC for MetS diagnosis, with a value of 0.832 (95% CI: 0.783–0.880). The abdominal volume index (AVI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) showed the highest sensitivity (82.3%), while the waist-triglyceride index (WTI) had the highest specificity (89%). Conclusion: Notably, both the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and LAP index achieved specificity and sensitivity values exceeding 70% and can be used in MetS screening of obese women. In contrast, the WWI was found to be statistically insufficient for defining MetS and distinguishing between SUA and AIP groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbaş et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=292). Lipid accumulation product (LAP) index vs. Other anthropometric indices was evaluated on Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (MetS) (AUC 0.832, 95% CI 0.783-0.880, p=<0.001). The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for metabolic syndrome in obese women, with an area under the curve of 0.832.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: