Key result
Maximal hyperaemic response is independently associated with resting CMR perfusion (standardised beta 0.315, p=0.012), suggesting cardiac microvascular dysfunction reflects wider systemic microcirculatory derangements.
Why the study?
Because microvascular coronary disease confers an additive poor prognosis, this study aimed to determine whether it reflects systemic microvascular dysregulation.
Cross-Sectional (n=102)
Yes
Maximal hyperaemic response of the skin microcirculation correlates with resting myocardial perfusion on CMR, suggesting that cardiac microvascular dysfunction may reflect broader systemic microcirculatory derangements.
Cardiac perfusion at rest may reflect systemic microvascular dysfunction; leaves open causal and prognostic implications in this cross-sectional analysis.
Background Coronary microvascular disease is often defined by symptoms in the absence of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. There is, however, a growing interest in exploring the vascular physiology of patients with chest pain syndromes who have been confirmed to have unobstructed coronary arteries. As it is known that people with microvascular coronary disease have an additive poor prognosis, we aimed to determine whether this was part of a systemic microvascular dysregulation. As such, we explored the correlations between cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion with cutaneous maximal hyperaemic response (MHR) and post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia (PORH), as assessed by laser Doppler fluximetry, in patients with known coronary anatomy determined via computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). Methods MHR was measured in response to local heating to 42°C and PORH was measured in response to a 4-minute ischaemic stimulus in 102 participants with and without diabetes and/or coronary artery disease, defined as coronary artery calcification of >0 Agatston units. Subepicardial and subendocardial perfusion at rest and in response to adenosine stress was measured via CMR. Results Out of 102 participants, 47 (45.1%) had diabetes, and 59 (57.8%) had coronary artery disease, with 32 (31.4%) having both. MHR and PORH were attenuated in participants with diabetes. Resting, but not stressed, CMR perfusion in all subepicardial and subendocardial territories was proportionately impaired in those with attenuated MHR. This association was independent of conventional risk factors including age, sex, blood pressure, glycaemia, coronary artery disease and body habitus (standardised beta 0.315, p=0.012). Conversely, PORH did not correlate with CMR perfusion at rest or after stress. Conclusions Maximal hyperaemic response is associated with resting CMR perfusion independent of conventional risk factors. This suggests that cardiac microvascular dysfunction may represent a manifestation of wider microcirculatory derangements. Further research is required to determine whether interventions that improve systemic vascular disturbances may improve cardiac microcirculation. Translational Perspective It is recognised that coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with residual symptoms in people with angina, after the correction of occlusive coronary arterial disease. As such it is a promising target for symptom control, however development of proof-of-concept trials is limited by the ability to monitor the coronary microcirculation in those trials. This manuscript identifies an appropriate surrogate endpoint that can be easily and non-invasively monitored and validates it against MRI imaging of the coronary microcirculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilcox et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease and/or diabetes (n=102). Maximal hyperaemic response (MHR) was evaluated on Correlation between resting cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion and cutaneous maximal hyperaemic response (MHR) (standardised beta 0.315, p=0.012). Maximal hyperaemic response is independently associated with resting CMR perfusion (standardised beta 0.315, p=0.012), suggesting cardiac microvascular dysfunction reflects wider systemic microcirculatory derangements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: