Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: In Norway, the speech therapist is responsible for the assessment of language impairment after stroke, but many hospitals have no speech therapist. This study therefore developed and evaluated a simple method to be used by nurses to detect aphasia in the acute stage of stroke; the Ullevaal Aphasia Screening (UAS) test. METHOD: The study was carried out among 37 stroke patients admitted to an acute stroke unit. They were assessed by nurses using the UAS, while the results of a comprehensive assessment by a speech therapist acted as the 'gold standard'. RESULTS: The predictive value of a positive test was 0.67 and that of a negative test 0.93; only two out of 28 who screened negative on the UAS were diagnosed with mild aphasia by the speech therapist. The weighted kappa coefficient of agreement was 0.83, indicating a strong agreement between the nurses' and speech therapists' scoring. The screening took 5-15 minutes to complete. CONCLUSION: The Ullevaal Aphasia screening test seems to be a short and valid screening instrument for aphasia in the acute stage of stroke, but further studies would be needed to substantiate the efficacy of the UAS test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thommessen et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: