Key result
Older patients (≥75 years) undergoing second-generation cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation had a significantly lower clinical success rate compared to younger patients (36.1% vs 47.0%, p=0.03).
Why the study?
Ablation procedures are increasingly offered to older patients with persistent AF, but clinical outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in this specific population are not well described.
Does second-generation cryoballoon ablation have different efficacy and safety in elderly patients (≥75 years) compared to younger patients (<75 years) with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=249)
Yes
Does second-generation cryoballoon ablation have different efficacy and safety in elderly patients (≥75 years) compared to younger patients (<75 years) with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 36.1% vs 47%
p-value: p=0.03
Second-generation cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation is safe in patients ≥75 years, but is associated with a significantly lower long-term success rate compared to younger patients.
May warrant caution selecting older patients for cryoballoon ablation; leaves open need for age-specific strategies in persistent AF.
Background It is expected that ablation procedures will be increasingly offered to a more aged population affected with persistent AF (persAF); however, the clinical outcomes of ablation in this specific population are not well described. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of CB‐A in this group of patients compared with a younger cohort. Methods and results Eighty‐three patients with (persAF) aged ≥75 years (group 1; mean age 78.2 ± 3.1 years) and 166 patients also affected with persAF aged <75 years (group 2; mean age 64.3 ± 6.6 years) were included in the study. The primary outcome was freedom from recurrent sustained (>30 seconds) atrial arrhythmias without anti‐arrhythmic medication after a blanking period of 3 months. At 2 years, clinical success was achieved in 108 out of 249 patients (43.4%). Median follow‐up was 24 months (IQR: 18.4‐25.5 months). Older patients suffered from more recurrences than those in the younger cohort ((53/83 patients, 63.9% vs 88/166 patients, 53.0%; P = .03). Thirty (12.0%) patients suffered a complication, but the incidence of complications was not different between both groups. The most frequent complication was transient phrenic nerve injury. Conclusions The global 2 years efficacy of CB‐A PVI in persAF is 43.4%. A lower success rate is achieved in the older patients (36.1%) compared to the younger age group (47.0%). However, the complication rate was not different between age groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vermeersch et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=249). Age ≥75 years vs. Age <75 years was evaluated on Freedom from recurrent sustained (>30 seconds) atrial arrhythmias without anti-arrhythmic medication after a blanking period of 3 months (p=0.03). Older patients (≥75 years) undergoing second-generation cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation had a significantly lower clinical success rate compared to younger patients (36.1% vs 47.0%, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: