Key result
Aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction for type A aortic dissection was feasible regardless of severe preoperative conditions, with a hospital mortality of 16.3% and 1-year survival of 82.5%.
Why the study?
Surgical management of type A aortic dissection remains debated, and the feasibility and safety of aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction in severe preoperative conditions were evaluated.
Is the aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction (AVSR) procedure feasible and safe in patients with type A aortic dissection and severe preoperative conditions?
Cohort (n=92)
No
Is the aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction (AVSR) procedure feasible and safe in patients with type A aortic dissection and severe preoperative conditions?
Aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction is a feasible and safe option for type A aortic dissection, even in the presence of severe preoperative malperfusion or shock.
BACKGROUND: Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) surgical management is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction (AVSR) procedure in 92 consecutive patients operated for TAAD, even when preoperative condition was severe (malperfusion, shock or both). METHODS: Our hospital database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent an AVSR procedure for TAAD over 14 years. From May 2000 to June 2014, 92 consecutive patients were studied regarding to their preoperative condition. RESULTS: Age (61±13 years) and logistic Euroscore (23.4±15.3%) as well as cross-clamping (113±39 min), cardiopulmonary bypass (142±49 min) and circulatory arrest (22±13 min) times were collected. Hospital mortality was 16.3%. Mean follow-up was complete for a mean period of 27.6 months. One patient had early reoperation for aortic insufficiency. Actuarial survival at 1 year was 82.5%. The analysis of each group showed comparable mortality and morbidity in between patients. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon our experience in the management of TAAD, a reimplantation procedure could be performed regardless preoperative malperfusion or shock, with an acceptable postoperative over mortality or morbidity. A word of caution should be brought to patients over 70 years old.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lapeze et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) (n=92). Aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction (AVSR) was evaluated on Hospital mortality. Aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction for type A aortic dissection was feasible regardless of severe preoperative conditions, with a hospital mortality of 16.3% and 1-year survival of 82.5%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: