Key result
Intra-arterial tirofiban during endovascular therapy after IV tPA was not associated with postprocedural parenchymal hematoma or thick subarachnoid hemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.20-4.10; P=.918).
Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of tirofiban during endovascular therapy in patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant IV tPA remain unclear.
Does intra-arterial tirofiban during endovascular therapy after IV tPA increase bleeding risk or improve outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Cohort (n=314)
Yes
Does intra-arterial tirofiban during endovascular therapy after IV tPA increase bleeding risk or improve outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Odds Ratio: 1.07 (95% CI 0.2–4.1)
p-value: p=.918
Intra-arterial tirofiban during endovascular therapy after IV tPA appears safe without significantly increasing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage or mortality in acute ischemic stroke patients.
No excess hemorrhage signal after IV tPA plus EVT; leaves open randomized trials for efficacy and broader safety.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of tirofiban during endovascular therapy in patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant IV tPA remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial tirofiban use during endovascular therapy in patients treated with IV tPA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a multicenter registry, we enrolled patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular therapy. Safety outcomes included postprocedural parenchymal hematoma type 2 and/or thick subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, and 3-month mortality. Efficacy outcomes included the successful reperfusion rate, postprocedural reocclusion, and good outcomes at 3 months (mRS scores of 0–2). The tirofiban effect on the outcomes was evaluated using a multivariable analysis while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among enrolled patients, we identified 314 patients with stroke (279 and 35 patients in the no tirofiban and tirofiban groups, respectively) due to an intracranial artery occlusion who underwent endovascular therapy with intravenous thrombolysis. A multivariable analysis revealed no association of intra-arterial tirofiban with postprocedural parenchymal hematoma type and/or thick subarachnoid hemorrhage (adjusted OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.20–4.10; P = .918), intraventricular hemorrhage (adjusted OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.02–2.85; P = .467), and 3-month mortality (adjusted OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.04–1.87; P = .299). Intra-arterial tirofiban was not associated with good outcome (adjusted OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 0.89 –6.12; P = .099). CONCLUSIONS: Using intra-arterial tirofiban during endovascular therapy after IV tPA could be safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=314). Intra-arterial tirofiban vs. No tirofiban was evaluated on postprocedural parenchymal hematoma type and/or thick subarachnoid hemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.20-4.10, p=.918). Intra-arterial tirofiban during endovascular therapy after IV tPA was not associated with postprocedural parenchymal hematoma or thick subarachnoid hemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.20-4.10; P=.918).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: