Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) poses an extremely difficult problem in cirrhotic patients who are in need of a liver transplant. The prevalence of PVT in patients with cirrhosis ranges from 0.6% to 26% Nery et al. (2015) [1]. The presence of PVT is associated with more technically difficult liver transplant and in certain cases can be a contraindication to liver transplant. The only option for these patients with extensive PVT would be a multi-visceral transplant, the later unfortunately has a much higher morbidity and mortality compared to liver only transplant Smith et al. (2016) [2]. An alternative approach is needed to provide a safe and reliable outcome. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In this case series, we present our experience with reno-portal shunt as an alternative inflow for the liver allograft. DISCUSSION: This approach appears to be safe with good long-term outcome.Although this technique has been described before, we provide additional considerations that produced good outcomes in our patients. CONCLUSION: We believe that meticulous preoperative planning with high-resolution triple phase CT imaging with a measurement of the diameter of the spleno-renal shunt along with a duplex scan measuring flow through the shunt is key to a successful transplantation. Moreover, appropriate donor liver size is also of extreme importance to avoid portal hypoperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazzal et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: