Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 5, 2003BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersOpen Access

No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

OROtto RobertssonDalhousie UniversityJRJonas RanstamStatistics Sweden

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Robertsson et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a79e3e38d250a4360f3cabahttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prostheses. A review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.1995 · 182 citations
  2. 2The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Project2000 · 69 citations
  3. 3Estimation of Multivariate Frailty Models Using Penalized Partial Likelihood2000 · 408 citations
  4. 4Survivorship of hip prosthesis in primary arthrosis2002 · 19 citations
  5. 5Regression Models and Life-Tables1972 · 39,968 citations