Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Decreasing soil water potential (minima of −0.3, −2.0 and −6.0 bars) reduced fruit number, set, and mean and total fruit weight of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Under the 2 wettest soil water regimes, NH 4 -N compared to NO 3 -N fertilization reduced total and mean fruit weights but increased fruit number whereas no differences in these variables were found between N-forms under the driest regime. Incidence and severity of blossom-end rot (BER) were increased by NH 4 nutrition and by decreasing soil water potential (SWP). Decreasing SWP either had no effect or increased leaf Ca, Mg, and K concentrations but decreased fruit concentration of these ions. At any soil water regime, NH 4 fertilization decreased leaf Ca and Mg concentration but generally increased leaf K and fruit Ca, Mg, and K concentrations. While BER incidence and severity did not appear to be related to fruit Ca, Mg, and K concentration, the disorder was associated with increased stylar to calyx fruit-half concentration ratios of these ions. Basal (pre-dawn) leaf xylem pressure potential ( ψ p ) was unaffected by N nutrition but was greater (less negative) under the wettest regime. Compared to plants supplied with NO 3 -N whose minimal and mean light-saturation ψ p values decreased with decreasing SWP, plants given NH 4 -N reached a constant ψ p level regardless of soil water regime. Since leaf diffusive resistance (R L ) values increased with decreasing SWP, but were unaffected by N form, the lower transpiration and transpiration rates under NH 4 -N might be explained by increased non-leaf resistances to water flux and/or by reduced soil-plant water potential gradients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pill et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: