Key result
Differing ICD-10 coding standards drive divergent annual NSTEMI trends between England and Western Australia.
Why the study?
Does the utility of fourth-digit ICD-10 codes for identifying trends in STEMI and NSTEMI differ between person-linked electronic hospitalization datasets in England and Western Australia?
Cohort (n=972,170)
Yes
Does the utility of fourth-digit ICD-10 codes for identifying trends in STEMI and NSTEMI differ between person-linked electronic hospitalization datasets in England and Western Australia?
Jurisdictional differences in ICD-10 coding standards substantially impact the recorded proportions and temporal trends of NSTEMI and unspecified MI, limiting the reliability of unvalidated fourth-digit ICD-10 codes for differentiating MI subtypes in electronic hospital data.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in investigating trends in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) using person-linked electronic hospitalisation data in England and Western Australia (WA). METHODS: All hospital admissions with myocardial infarction (MI) as the principal diagnosis were identified from 2000 to 2013 from both jurisdictions. Fourth-digit ICD-10 codes were used to delineate all MI types-STEMI, NSTEMI, unspecified and subsequent MI. The annual frequency of each MI type was calculated as a proportion of all MI admissions. For all MI and each MI type, age-standardised rates were calculated and age-adjusted Poisson regression models used to estimate annual percentage changes in rates. RESULTS: In 2000, STEMI accounted for 49% of all MI admissions in England and 59% in WA, decreasing to 35% and 25% respectively by 2013. Less than 10% of admissions were recorded as NSTEMI in England throughout the study period, whereas by 2013, 70% of admissions were NSTEMI in WA. Unspecified MI comprised 60% of all MI admissions in England by 2013, compared with <1% in WA. Trends in age-standardised rates differed for all MI (England, -2.7%/year; WA, +1.7%/year), underpinned by differing age-adjusted trends in NSTEMI (England, -6.1%/year; WA, +10.2%/year). CONCLUSION: Differences between the proportion and trends for MI types in English and WA data were observed. These were consistent with the coding standards in each country. This has important implications for using electronic hospital data for monitoring MI and identifying MI types for outcome studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nedkoff et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (STEMI, NSTEMI, unspecified MI, subsequent MI) (n=972,170). Fourth-digit ICD-10 coding in England (WHO version) vs. Fourth-digit ICD-10 coding in Western Australia (Australian Modification, ICD-10-AM) was evaluated on Annual percentage change in age- and sex-adjusted hospitalization rates for NSTEMI. Fourth-digit ICD-10 coding yielded diverging age-adjusted annual NSTEMI rate trends between England (-6.1%/year) and Western Australia (+10.2%/year) due to differing national coding standards.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: