Key result
Treadmill testing elicited higher VO2 peak in runners (~7%; d=0.92) and swimmers (~5%; d=0.75), while cycle ergometry produced higher VO2 peak in cyclists (~8%; d=0.92).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses of a maximal graded exercise test on a treadmill versus a cycle ergometer in elite-level youth competitive athletes.
Does exercise mode (treadmill vs. cycling) affect physiological outcome variables in elite teenage competitive athletes?
RCT (n=31)
Randomized crossover
Does exercise mode (treadmill vs. cycling) affect physiological outcome variables in elite teenage competitive athletes?
Exercise testing mode significantly affects physiological outcomes like V̇o2 peak, with athletes generally performing best in modalities matching their specific training.
Exercise modality may influence VO2peak in elite youth athletes; leaves open optimal testing protocols across sports.
Marko, D, Bahenský, P, Snarr, RL, and Malátová, R. V̇ o2 peak Comparison of a treadmill vs. cycling protocol in elite teenage competitive runners, cyclists, and swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 36(10): 2875-2882, 2022-The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses of a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill and cycle ergometer in elite-level, youth competitive athletes. Thirty-one athletes (11 distance runners, 11 mountain-bike cyclists, and 9 long-distance swimmers) were randomly selected to complete either a running or cycling GXT on the first day, followed by the alternative 72 hours apart. The initial work rate for each GXT was set at 50% of the individuals' previously established V̇ o2 peak to elicit fatigue within 8-12 minutes. For the treadmill protocol, speed was increased by 1 km·h -1 each minute, with a constant 5% grade, until volitional fatigue. Cycle ergometer work rate was increased by 30 W every minute until volitional fatigue or the inability to maintain proper cadence (i.e., 100 ± 5 rev·min -1 ). Throughout both testing sessions, V̇ o2 peak, heart rate [HR] peak, breathing frequency (BF), tidal volume (V T ), and minute ventilation (V E ) were assessed and used to compare within-sport differences. Runners displayed a higher V̇ o2 peak (∼7%; d = 0.92), HRpeak (4%; d = 0.77), V E (6%; d = 0.66), and BF (12%; d = 0.62) on the treadmill vs. cycle. However, the cycling group demonstrated a greater V̇ o2 peak (∼8%; d = 0.92), V T (∼14%; d = 0.99), and V E (∼9%; d = 0.78) on the cycle, despite no change in HRpeak. For swimmers, the treadmill GXT elicited higher values in V̇ o2 peak (∼5%; d = 0.75), BF (∼11.5%; d = 0.78), and HRpeak (3%; d = 0.69). Collectively, these findings indicate that exercise mode may greatly affect physiological outcome variables and should be considered before exercise prescription and athletic monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marko et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Healthy elite teenage athletes (n=31). Treadmill graded exercise test (GXT) vs. Cycle ergometer graded exercise test (GXT) was evaluated on Cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses including V̇o2 peak. Treadmill testing elicited higher VO2 peak in runners (~7%; d=0.92) and swimmers (~5%; d=0.75), while cycle ergometry produced higher VO2 peak in cyclists (~8%; d=0.92).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: