Key result
Incremental treadmill and cycle exercise testing elicited similar ventilation, operating lung volumes, and dyspnoea intensity at any given external power output in obese patients with COPD.
Why the study?
Does exercise test modality (treadmill vs cycle) influence dyspnoea perception in obese patients with COPD?
Cross-Sectional (n=18)
Does exercise test modality (treadmill vs cycle) influence dyspnoea perception in obese patients with COPD?
Either treadmill or cycle exercise modalities can be reliably used to evaluate exertional dyspnoea in obese patients with COPD, as dyspnoea perception remains similar despite physiological differences.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether differences in physiological responses to weight-bearing (walking) and weight-supported (cycle) exercise influence dyspnoea perception in obese chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, where such discrepancies are probably exaggerated. We compared metabolic, ventilatory and perceptual responses during incremental treadmill and cycle exercise using a matched linearised rise in work rate in 18 (10 males and eight females) obese (mean ± sd body mass index 36.4 ± 5.0 kg·m(-2)) patients with COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s 60 ± 11% predicted). Compared with cycle testing, treadmill testing was associated with a significantly higher oxygen uptake, lower ventilatory equivalent for oxygen and greater oxyhaemoglobin desaturation at a given work rate (p<0.01). Cycle testing was associated with a higher respiratory exchange ratio (p<0.01), earlier ventilatory threshold (p<0.01) and greater peak leg discomfort ratings (p=0.01). Ventilation, breathing pattern and operating lung volumes were similar between tests, as were dyspnoea/work rate and dyspnoea/ventilation relationships. Despite significant between-test differences in physiological responses, ventilation, operating lung volumes and dyspnoea intensity were similar at any given external power output during incremental walking and cycling exercise in obese COPD patients. These data provide evidence that either exercise modality can be selected for reliable evaluation of exertional dyspnoea in this population in research and clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciavaglia et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Obese chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=18). Treadmill testing (weight-bearing exercise) vs. Cycle testing (weight-supported exercise) was evaluated on Dyspnoea perception and physiological responses (ventilation, operating lung volumes, dyspnoea intensity). Incremental treadmill and cycle exercise testing elicited similar ventilation, operating lung volumes, and dyspnoea intensity at any given external power output in obese patients with COPD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: