Key result
LiCA hs-cTnI assay correlates strongly with Architect and matches its diagnostic accuracy for NSTEMI.
Why the study?
Does the LiCA hs-cTnI assay provide comparable diagnostic accuracy for NSTEMI compared to the established Architect hs-cTnI assay?
Observational
Does the LiCA hs-cTnI assay provide comparable diagnostic accuracy for NSTEMI compared to the established Architect hs-cTnI assay?
The new LiCA hs-cTnI assay meets the requirements for a 3rd generation high-sensitivity method and offers comparable diagnostic accuracy for NSTEMI to the established Architect assay.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sex-specific URLs and NSTEMI performance data for this assay extend lab options; leaves open routine adoption pending outcome studies.
Objectives To validate the analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay on the automated light-initiated chemiluminescent assay (LiCA®) platform. Methods Comprehensive analytical validations were performed, and the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) from apparently healthy individuals were established. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the assay for NSTEMI. Results The limit of quantitation (LoQ) were 1.9 ng/L (20% CV) and 5.1 ng/L (10% CV). The sex-specific 99th percentile URLs were 17.6 ng/L (4.2% CV) for men (age 20–79y) and 14.2 ng/L (4.9% CV) for women (age 19–89y) in serum, 14.4 ng/L (4.9% CV) for men (age 19–88y) and 12.9 ng/L (5.2% CV) for women (age 19–87y) in plasma, respectively. Detection rates in healthy individuals were from 98.7 to 99.1%. The correlation coefficient and median bias between LiCA and Architect were 0.985 and 0.1% (−2.0–2.9%) in full analytical range of serum specimens. In lower range (<100 ng/L), LiCA had an overall positive bias 6.7% (−1.6–13.3%), R=0.949. At the specific medical decision levels (15.2, 26.2 and 64.0 ng/L), assay difference was estimated to be <10%. No significant differences on AUC, sensitivity and specificity, NPV and PPV were found between LiCA and Architect for the diagnosis of NSTEMI. Conclusions LiCA hs-cTnI is a precise, highly sensitive and specific assay that meets the requirement of a 3rd generation (level 4) high-sensitivity method. The diagnostic accuracy of LiCA assay for NSTEMI is comparable to the established Architect hs-cTnI assay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). LiCA high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay vs. Architect hs-cTnI assay was evaluated on Analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy for NSTEMI (r=0.985). The LiCA hs-cTnI assay correlated strongly with the Architect assay (r=0.985, median bias 0.1%) and showed comparable diagnostic accuracy for NSTEMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: