Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Triggering tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (TNFR1) induces apoptosis in various cell lines. In contrast, stimulation of TNFR1 in L929sA leads to necrosis. Inhibition of HSP90, a chaperone for many kinases, by geldanamycin or radicicol shifted the response of L929sA cells to TNF from necrosis to apoptosis. This shift was blocked by CrmA but not by BCL-2 overexpression, suggesting that it occurred through activation of procaspase-8. Geldanamycin pretreatment led to a proteasome-dependent decrease in the levels of several TNFR1-interacting proteins including the kinases receptor-interacting protein, inhibitor of kappa B kinase-alpha, inhibitor of kappa B kinase-beta, and to a lesser extent the adaptors NF-kappaB essential modulator and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2. As a consequence, NF-kappa B, p38MAPK, and JNK activation were abolished. No significant decrease in the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinases, adaptor proteins TNFR-associated death domain and Fas-associated death domain, or caspase-3, -8, and -9 could be detected. These results suggest that HSP90 client proteins play a crucial role in necrotic signaling. We conclude that inhibition of HSP90 may alter the composition of the TNFR1 complex, favoring the caspase-8-dependent apoptotic pathway. In the absence of geldanamycin, certain HSP90 client proteins may be preferentially recruited to the TNFR1 complex, promoting necrosis. Thus, the availability of proteins such as receptor-interacting protein, Fas-associated death domain, and caspase-8 can determine whether TNFR1 activation will lead to apoptosis or to necrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berghe et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: