Why the study?
Appropriate patient selection for CTO-PCI is increasingly important, but cardiac MRI has limitations including contraindications, cost, and accessibility.
Can two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) accurately evaluate myocardial ischemia and scar transmurality compared to cardiovascular MRI in patients undergoing CTO-PCI?
Observational (n=55)
No
Can two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) accurately evaluate myocardial ischemia and scar transmurality compared to cardiovascular MRI in patients undergoing CTO-PCI?
2D-STE provides a viable non-invasive alternative to MRI for assessing myocardial scar transmurality and treatment effects in patients undergoing CTO-PCI.
Background: As percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) gains wider acceptance as a therapeutic option for coronary artery disease, the importance of appropriate patient selection has increased. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows segmental and quantitative analyses of myocardial ischemia and scar transmurality, it has limitations, including contraindications, cost, and accessibility. This study established a non-invasive method to evaluate patients undergoing CTO-PCI using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Methods: Overall, we studied 55 patients who underwent successful CTO-PCI. Cardiovascular MRI and 2D-STE were performed before and 8 ± 2 months after CTO-PCI. Segmental findings of strain parameters were compared with those obtained with late gadolinium enhancement and stress-perfusion MRI. Results: With a cutoff of −10.7, pre-procedural circumferential strain (CS) showed reasonable sensitivity (71%) and specificity (73%) for detecting segments with transmural scar. The discriminatory ability of longitudinal strain (LS) for segments with transmural scar significantly improved during follow-up after successful CTO-PCI in the territory of the recanalized artery (area under the curve (AUC) 0.70 vs. 0.80, p < 0.001). LS accuracy was lower than that of CS at baseline (AUC 0.70 vs. 0.79, p = 0.048), and was increased at follow-up (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.82, p = 0.81). Changes in myocardial perfusion reserve from baseline to follow-up were significantly associated with those in LS but not in CS. Conclusions: Use of 2D-STE may allow the non-invasive evaluation of patients undergoing CTO-PCI to assess the indication before the procedure and treatment effects at follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakachi et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Coronary chronic total occlusion (n=55). Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) before and after CTO-PCI vs. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (LGE and stress-perfusion MRI) was evaluated on Detection of myocardial segments with transmural scar (LGE > 50%) at baseline (CS vs LS) (p=0.048).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: