Why the study?
Does mucosal administration of Th1 or Th2 cytokines improve survival and exert antitumor activity in mice challenged with virus or leukemia cells?
Does mucosal administration of Th1 or Th2 cytokines improve survival and exert antitumor activity in mice challenged with virus or leukemia cells?
Mucosal administration of Th1 cytokines demonstrates significant systemic antiviral and antitumor activity in murine models, potentially mediated by soluble factors or specific cell activation in the oropharyngeal cavity.
Supports preclinical mucosal Th1 cytokine testing in viral and cancer models; leaves open human translation.
Mucosal administration of the Th1 stimulatory cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) induced antiviral activity in mice challenged systemically with a lethal dose of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) similar to that observed following parenteral administration. In contrast, mucosal administration of the Th2 stimulatory cytokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, or IL-13 did not affect significantly the survival of EMCV-infected animals. Mucosal administration of IL-2 or IL-12 also exerted a marked antitumor activity in mice inoculated intravenously with Friend erythroleukemia cells. Recombinant IL-2 and IL-18, but none of the other recombinant cytokines tested, induced low levels of IFN in vitro. Polyclonal antibodies to both mouse and human interferon-alpha/beta (IFN-alpha/beta) abrogated the antiviral activity of IL-2 in vivo, even though the anti-human IFN-alpha/beta antibody did not neutralize mouse IFN-alpha/beta, and neither antibody bound to IL-2. IL-15 did not exhibit antiviral activity in IFN-alpha/beta R-/- mice, which are deficient in natural killer (NK) cell activity. These results suggest that mucosal Th1 cytokine therapy induces a soluble factor or activates a specific cell population in the lymphoid or epithelial tissue of the oropharyngeal cavity, which potentiates elimination of virus-infected or neoplasic cells systemically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tovey et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: