Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of "best practice" program components across a select sample of organizations, and to explore differences in engagement rates and health risk reduction between organizations using "best-practice" and "common-practice" health management approaches. METHODS: Using a retrospective approach, researchers assigned organizations to a "best practice" or "common-practice" group based on well-defined criteria. The study examined group differences in employee health assessment participation rates, health coaching program participation and completion rates, and organizational-level health risk reduction. RESULTS: Best-practice organizations achieved higher levels of engagement than common-practice organizations in both health assessment and health coaching programs. Population-level and intervention-level health risk reduction was 2.35 and 1.08 times higher, respectively, among best-practice organizations compared with common-practice organizations. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the contribution of quality program components to superior program engagement rates and health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terry et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: