Key result
This state-of-the-art review outlines the pathobiology, genomics, proteomics, and potential novel therapies for perimyocarditis, infective endocarditis, and cardiac device infections.
This review highlights the evolving role of infections in cardiovascular diseases, including perimyocarditis, infective endocarditis, and device infections, emphasizing advances in genomics and proteomics.
May guide clinician awareness of molecular advances in cardiac infections; leaves open validation of novel therapies in prospective trials.
Infections have been recognized as significant causes of cardiac diseases for many decades. Various microorganisms have been implicated in the etiology of these diseases involving all classes of microbial agents. All components of the heart structure can be affected by infectious agents, i.e. pericardium, myocardium, endocardium, valves, autonomic nervous system, and some evidence of coronary arteries. A new breed of infections have evolved over the past three decades involving cardiac implants and this group of cardiac infectious complications will likely continue to increase in the future, as more mechanical devices are implanted in the growing ageing population. This article will review the progress made in the past decade on understanding the pathobiology of these infectious complications of the heart, through advances in genomics and proteomics, as well as potential novel approach for therapy.An up-to-date, state-of-the-art review and controversies will be outlined for the following conditions: (i) perimyocarditis; (ii) infective endocarditis; (iii) cardiac device infections; (iv) coronary artery disease and potential role of infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
I. W. Fong (2009) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease infections. This state-of-the-art review outlines the pathobiology, genomics, proteomics, and potential novel therapies for perimyocarditis, infective endocarditis, and cardiac device infections.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: