Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rough-and-tumble play is a distinctive form of behaviour. Although it appears superficially similar to fighting, there is considerable evidence that it differs in terms of causation and intent. A number of criteria for distinguishing the two forms of behaviour are cited, and evidence that children are able to use many of these criteria is presented. Rough-and-tumble play is considered in relation to dominance and affiliative relationships in children, and its possible functional significance in development is discussed. Rough-and-tumble play may exercise certain social skills, but as a form of behaviour it can also be used in socially manipulative ways, for example to inflict harm or achieve dominance. Implications for a social skills deficit model of aggressive behaviour in childhood are considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: