Existing main memory data processing systems employ a variety of storage organizations and make a number of storage-related design choices. The focus of this paper is on systematically evaluating a number of these key storage design choices for main memory analytical (i.e. read-optimized) database settings. Our evaluation produces a number of key insights: First, it is always beneficial to organize data into self-contained memory blocks rather than large files. Second, both column-stores and row-stores display performance advantages for different types of queries, and for high performance both should be implemented as options for the tuple-storage layout. Third, cache-sensitive B+-tree indices can play a major role in accelerating query performance, especially when used in a block-oriented organization. Finally, compression can also play a role in accelerating query performance depending on data distribution and query selectivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chasseur et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: