Key result
A novel automated latex-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for GDF15 accurately distinguished patients with mitochondrial diseases from healthy controls (AUC 0.951; 95% CI 0.910-0.992).
Why the study?
Mitochondrial diseases are occasionally difficult to diagnose, prompting the development and evaluation of an automated assay to measure serum GDF15 concentrations at medical institutions.
Does a novel LTIA device accurately measure serum GDF15 concentrations compared to an ELISA kit in patients with suspected mitochondrial diseases?
Observational (n=232)
Does a novel LTIA device accurately measure serum GDF15 concentrations compared to an ELISA kit in patients with suspected mitochondrial diseases?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.951 (95% CI 0.910-0.992)
p-value: p=< .001
The automated LTIA device provides a reliable, faster, and potentially more cost-effective method for measuring GDF15 as a diagnostic indicator for mitochondrial diseases compared to standard ELISA.
May enable automated GDF15 testing for MDs in routine labs; leaves open diagnostic performance until validated prospectively.
Mitochondrial diseases (MDs) are occasionally difficult to diagnose. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) has been reported as a biomarker useful for not only diagnosing MDs, but also evaluating disease severity and therapeutic efficacy. To enable the measurement of serum GDF15 concentrations at medical institutions, we developed a new latex-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (LTIA) as an automated diagnostic indication test for MDs. We also examined the equivalency of specificity and sensitivity in measuring serum GDF15 concentrations between a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit and a novel LTIA device in patients with MDs, disease controls, and healthy controls. A clinical performance study used a newly developed LTIA device and an existing ELISA kit to measure the concentrations of GDF15 in 35 MD patients, 111 disease controls, and 86 healthy controls. The median (first quartile-third quartile) of serum GDF15 concentrations measured with the LTIA device was significantly higher (P < .001) in MD patients (1389.0 U/mL [869.5-1776.0 U/mL]) than in healthy controls (380.5 U/mL [330.2-471.8 U/mL]); the interquartile ranges did not overlap between MD patients and healthy controls. The areas under the curve in disease and healthy controls were 0.812 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.734-0.886) and 0.951 (95% CI: 0.910-0.992), respectively. The automated, high-throughput technology-based LTIA device has definite advantages over the ELISA kit in shorter processing time and lower estimated cost per sample measurement. The LTIA device of GDF15 may be a sufficiently reliable, frontline, diagnostic indicator of individuals with suspected MDs in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koga et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Mitochondrial diseases (n=232). Latex-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (LTIA) for GDF15 vs. Healthy controls and disease controls was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve) for distinguishing mitochondrial disease patients from healthy controls (AUC 0.951, 95% CI 0.910-0.992, p=< .001). A novel automated latex-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for GDF15 accurately distinguished patients with mitochondrial diseases from healthy controls (AUC 0.951; 95% CI 0.910-0.992).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: