Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cryptococcus neoformans produced pigments when p-diphenols were substrates in a glucose-amino acid-salts medium. The best substrates were 2.5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 2,5-dihydroxybenzenesulfonic acid. In contrast to the cellular pigment production from o-diphenols (hydroxyl groups in the 2,3- or 3,4-position of phenyl ring), the p-diphenols (1,4- or 2,5-positions for the hydroxyl groups) produced large amounts of soluble pigments that diffused into the medium. When an optimal source of nitrogen (glutamine, glycine, and asparagine) was used, 89% of the C. neoformans strains produced pigments from p-diphenols. In contrast, 0 to 67% of the strains produced pigments when a suboptimal nitrogen source (proline, ammonium sulfate, ornithine, and methionine) was used. When glutamine-glycine-asparagine was the nitrogen source, 100% of the C. neoformans strains produced pigments from o0diphenols, whereas 77 to 100% of the strains produced pigment when proline-ammonium sulfate-ornithine-methionine was the nitrogen source. Cryptococcus species other than C. neoformans and all tested Candida species failed to produce pigments from any of the substrates except when hydroquinone was used. A combination of glutamine-glycine-asparagine and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine allowed differentiation of colonies of C. neoformans from C. albicans in 3 to 6 days. These data showed that pigment production from o- and p-diphenols served as an excellent biochemical test for the identification of C. neoformans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaskes et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: