Virtual idols – digitally created influencers with programmable personas and symbolic identities – are increasingly used in hospitality marketing, yet the processes through which their perceived advertising appeals shape booking-related responses remain insufficiently understood. Drawing on the Stimulus – Organism – Response framework, this study examines how emotional, informative, creative, and entertaining appeals in virtual-idol hotel advertising influence self-congruence and self-referencing, and how these identity-related processes subsequently predict impulsiveness and impulsive hotel booking intention. Survey data were collected from 385 Saudi consumers aged 18–45 who had prior exposure to virtual-idol or AI-generated influencer content and recent online hotel-booking experience. The model was assessed using PLS-SEM, mediation and moderation analyses, and PLSpredict. The results reveal differentiated appeal pathways. Emotional and entertainment appeals positively predict both self-congruence and self-referencing, creativity predicts only self-congruence, and informativeness predicts only self-referencing. Both self-congruence and self-referencing increase impulsiveness, which mediates their relationships with impulsive hotel booking intention. Social influence strengthens the relationship between self-congruence and impulsiveness but does not significantly moderate the self-referencing pathway. Technology anxiety weakens the self-congruence – impulsiveness relationship but unexpectedly strengthens the self-referencing – impulsiveness relationship. The findings clarify how perceived virtual-idol advertising appeals become relevant to impulsive booking intention through distinct identity-processing routes and show that these relationships vary according to social and technological conditions. Practically, the results suggest that virtual-idol hotel advertisements should align their emotional, creative, informative, and entertaining elements with the particular identity process they are intended to activate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: