Why the study?
Does intraoperative TEE provide reliable hemodynamic monitoring compared to PAC in non-cirrhotic patients undergoing major liver resection with hepatic vascular exclusion?
Does intraoperative TEE provide reliable hemodynamic monitoring compared to PAC in non-cirrhotic patients undergoing major liver resection with hepatic vascular exclusion?
Intraoperative TEE is a reliable alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization for hemodynamic monitoring during major liver resections with hepatic vascular exclusion.
May support TEE for hemodynamic monitoring in liver resection; leaves open prospective validation versus PAC.
The aim of this clinical observation was to compare intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) during hepatic vascular exclusion (HEV). Five non-cirrhotic patients to undergo HVE for major liver resection have been observed. Hemodynamic parameters: pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac index (CI), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) have been monitored by PAC. Left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA), left ventricular end-systolic area (LVESA), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), cardiac index (CI), cardiac output (CO), and fractional area changes (FAC) have been monitored by TEE. Hemodynamic variables were assessed before clamping (), at 5 and 30 minutes after clamping (, ) and 15 minutes after unclamping (). No significant difference between PCWP and LVEDP was found. LVEDP significantly decreased at and compared to (); PCWP showed the same trend. A correlation was found between SV and LVEDP ( , ) as well as CI (, ). Data confirm that intraoperative TEE may be a reliable method for hemodynamic monitoring during major liver resections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marinangeli et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: