Key result
ESC NSTE-ACS guidelines prefer rapid rule-out, prasugrel, ticagrelor, fondaparinux, and radial access over AHA/ACC.
Why the study?
The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology periodically release guidelines for NSTE-ACS, prompting a comparison of their recommendations and evidence bases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
This review provides a comparative analysis of the AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines for NSTE-ACS, highlighting key differences in diagnostic protocols, anticoagulation, and arterial access.
Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease worldwide. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology periodically release practice guidelines to guide clinicians in the management of NSTE-ACS, most recently in in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The present review compares and contrasts the 2 guidelines, with a focus on the strength of recommendation and level of evidence in the approach to initial presentation and diagnosis of NSTE-ACS, risk assessment, treatments, and systems of care. Important differences include the use of a rapid rule-out protocol with high-sensitivity troponin assays, a preference for prasugrel/ticagrelor and fondaparinux for anticoagulation therapy, and a preference for radial arterial access in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines compared with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines. We also highlight the similarities and differences in the guidelines for special patient populations and suggest areas of further study.
Rodríguez et al. (2016) conducted a review in Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). European Society of Cardiology guidelines vs. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines was evaluated. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines for NSTE-ACS prefer rapid rule-out protocols, prasugrel/ticagrelor, fondaparinux, and radial arterial access compared with AHA/ACC guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: