Why the study?
Does CYP2C19 LOF carrier status associate with higher P2Y12 reaction units in adults receiving DAPT after minor AIS or TIA?
Population
35 adults with non-cardioembolic minor acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack treated…
Comparison
CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) carrier status vs CYP2C19 noncarriers
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
30-day
Key result
CYP2C19 loss-of-function carrier status was associated with significantly higher mean P2Y12 reaction units compared with noncarriers (265 vs. 161; p < 0.01) in patients receiving DAPT after AIS or TIA.
Authors
Loading...
May support genotype-guided DAPT after minor AIS/TIA; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in CYP2C19 LOF carriers.
Observational (n=35)
Does CYP2C19 LOF carrier status associate with higher P2Y12 reaction units in adults receiving DAPT after minor AIS or TIA?
Absolute Event Rate: 265% vs 161%
p-value: p=< 0.01
P2Y12 reaction units vary significantly by CYP2C19 genotype in patients receiving DAPT after minor AIS or TIA, suggesting utility as a surrogate marker for clopidogrel nonresponse when genotyping is unavailable.
Stone et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Minor acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) (n=35). CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) carrier status vs. CYP2C19 noncarriers was evaluated on Group difference in P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) by CYP2C19 LOF carrier status (p=< 0.01). CYP2C19 loss-of-function carrier status was associated with significantly higher mean P2Y12 reaction units compared with noncarriers (265 vs. 161; p < 0.01) in patients receiving DAPT after AIS or TIA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: