Key result
Traditional and digital health education interventions improve self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
Low self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease leads to poor health outcomes and quality of life, making suitable educational methods essential.
Do traditional and digital-based health educational methods improve self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease?
Systematic Review (n=1,961)
Yes
Do traditional and digital-based health educational methods improve self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease?
Both traditional printed media (such as booklets) and digital health interventions (such as mobile apps and WhatsApp) are effective strategies for clinicians and nurses to improve self-efficacy and self-care management in patients with coronary heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports incorporating traditional and digital education into coronary heart disease care to enhance self-efficacy; reinforces evidence from experimental studies and guides future comparative research.
Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with higher prevalence in low and middle-income countries. Self-efficacy (SE) is an essential element that affects a patients ability to manage their care, and low SE levels in patients with CHD can lead to poor health outcomes and quality of life. Planning suitable methods to improve SE in CHD patients is essential. Purpose: This review explores health education methods to improve SE in patients with CHD. Methods: Scoping review is reported based on the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A literature search was conducted using relevant keywords from six primary databases, such as CINAHL Plus with Full Text and Academic Search Complete, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Taylor and Francis, and one search engine, Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were full-text articles in English that were accessible, research articles with experimental designs. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist, and data synthesis was used thematically with an explorative, descriptive approach. Results: Fifteen articles were found and included in the review. There are two types of interventions such as traditional and digital-based health education. The media used in traditional health education are booklets, pamphlets, posters, and workbooks. In addition, digital-based health education generally uses websites, social platforms, mobile applications, video players and sound clips. Conclusion: This review found that traditional health education and digital-based interventions improve SE, knowledge, self-esteem and health literacy levels, in CHD patients. Health professionals, including nurses, may used both methods in improving self efficacy in CHD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugiharto et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=1,961). Traditional and digital-based health education interventions vs. Control group (982 patients; including standard care or printed pamphlet delivery) was evaluated on Self-efficacy (general self-efficacy, cardiac self-efficacy, and cardiac exercise self-efficacy). Traditional and digital-based health education interventions improved self-efficacy across 15 experimental studies (n=1,961) in patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: