Key result
Socioeconomic status is inversely related to obesity, with a small proportion (e.g., 4.9% in men for educational attainment) mediated by the clustering of health-related lifestyles.
Why the study?
Obesity levels are rising and weight status is related to socioeconomic status, which may also influence health-related lifestyles, prompting investigation into whether diet and physical activity mediate this relationship.
Cross-Sectional (n=61,768)
Effect estimate: 4.9% mediated (educational attainment in men) (95% CI 3.2-6.6)
p-value: p=<0.001
Socioeconomic status is inversely related to obesity, with a small but significant proportion of this association mediated by health-related lifestyles such as diet and physical activity.
Supports SES-targeted lifestyle interventions for obesity; leaves open causal mediation pending longitudinal data.
AIMS: Obesity levels have increased worldwide with serious public health concerns. However, weight status is related to socioeconomic status (SES), which may also influence health-related lifestyles. Here, we study the association between SES and obesity mediated by diet and physical activity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using cross-sectional data from 2006, 2011, 2014, and 2017 Spanish health surveys (the final sample consisted of 61 768 adults aged between 18 and 64 years), we conducted a latent class analysis to estimate health-related lifestyle clusters (based on dietary patterns and physical activity) and mediation analyses to evaluate the association of SES and obesity through the clustering of health-related lifestyles. In both men and women, SES was inversely related to obesity (P < 0.001) and positively related to healthier lifestyle classes (P < 0.001). Obesity was inversely related to healthier lifestyle classes (P < 0.001). A small-although significant-proportion mediated by the clustering of lifestyles was found as follows: 4.9%, 95% CI (6.6%, 3.2%) in men and 2.3%, 95% CI (3.4%, 1.3%) in women for educational attainment, 5.3%, 95% CI (7.2%, 3.6%) in men and 2.0%, 95% CI (2.9%, 1.1%) in women for occupational social class, and 4.9%, 95% CI (6.5%, 3.1%) and 1.9%, 95% CI (2.9%, 1.1%) combining the above two SES indicators. CONCLUSIONS: SES is related to obesity through clustering health-related lifestyles, with greater emphasis on men. However, the complex relationship between SES and weight status also suggests other indicators that contribute to the social gradient of obesity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayor et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=61,768). Socioeconomic status (SES) was evaluated on Proportion of the association between SES and obesity mediated by the clustering of health-related lifestyles (4.9% mediated (educational attainment in men), 95% CI 3.2-6.6, p=<0.001). Socioeconomic status is inversely related to obesity, with a small proportion (e.g., 4.9% in men for educational attainment) mediated by the clustering of health-related lifestyles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: