Why the study?
Does the use of additional ECG leads improve the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department?
Does the use of additional ECG leads improve the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department?
The use of additional ECG leads beyond the standard 12-lead may improve the sensitivity of early MI diagnosis in the emergency department.
May aid early MI detection with extended leads in ED; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
Despite known limitations, the standard 12 lead ECG is the principal risk stratification device for patients presenting with chest pain to the ED. However, it has a sensitivity of less than 60% for MI. One reason for this is that the standard placement of chest leads fails to interrogate many areas of the myocardium. Various workers have addressed this problem through the use of additional leads or body surface mapping. Additional leads on the posterior and right thoracic surface have been shown to give additional information, which may be important to the emergency physician. This review demonstrates the need for additional leads in the acute setting and makes recommendations about the utility of using additional leads in the ED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon Carley (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: