Why the study?
Does ST-segment elevation in lead V4R accurately diagnose right ventricular infarction in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction?
Does ST-segment elevation in lead V4R accurately diagnose right ventricular infarction in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recording of the V4R lead provides high sensitivity and specificity for the early recognition of right ventricular infarction in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction.
The sensitivity and specificity of ST-segment elevation in the right precordial lead V4R as an early indicator of right ventricular infarction were examined in a consecutive series of 110 patients admitted for acute inferior myocardial infarction. The sensitivity was 82.7%, the specificity 76.9% and the positive predictive value 70% in 58 patients with right ventricular infarction documented by autopsy or a combination of radionuclide ventriculography and one or more of the following tests: echocardiography, technetium-99m pyrophosphate scintigraphy and hemodynamic monitoring. The negative predictive value was 87.7%. Because of its simplicity and its high sensitivity and specificity, recording of V4R should be an intrinsic part of the early evaluation and electrocardiographic examination of acute inferior wall infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klein et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: