Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To develop a patient-based Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (P-SCCAI) of ulcerative colitis (UC) activity and to compare it with the clinician-based SCCAI, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of UC activity. Monitoring UC activity may give patients disease control and prevent unnecessary examinations. METHODS: Consecutive UC patients randomly completed the P-SCCAI either before or after consultation. Gastroenterologists assessed patients' UC activity on the same day. Overall agreement between SCCAI and P-SCCAI was calculated with Spearman's Rho and Mann-Whitney U test. Agreement regarding active disease versus remission and agreement at domain level were calculated by percent agreement and kappa (κ). RESULTS: 149 (response rate 84.7%) UC patients participated. P-SCCAI and SCCAI showed a large correlation (rs=0.79). The medians (IQR) of the P-SCCAI (3.78;0-15) tended to be higher than those of the SCCAI (2.86;0-13), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (z=1.71| p=0.088). In 77% of the cases the difference between clinicians' and patients' scores was not clinically different (i.e.≤2). Percentage agreement between clinicians and patients, judging UC as active or in remission, was 87%, rs=0.66, κ=0.66, indicating a substantial agreement. In general patients tended to report more physical symptoms than clinicians. C-Reactive protein (CRP) was found to have a significant association with both P-SCCAI and SCCAI (κ=0.32, κ=0.39 respectively) as was PGA (κ=0.73 for both indices). CONCLUSIONS: The P-SCCAI is a promising tool given its substantial agreement with the SCCAI and its feasibility. Therefore, P-SCCAI can complement SCCAI in clinical care and research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evertsz et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: