Key result
Modified NCEP criteria link metabolic syndrome to ~12-fold higher odds of type 2 diabetes.
Cross-Sectional (n=2,293)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To compare the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) using the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Plan III (NCEP) and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definitions and, using both definitions, determine and compare the association of MS, prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, hypertension (HTN) and cardiovascular disease risk (CVD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,293 randomly selected participants (aged ≥20 years) in a rural community in Bangladesh were investigated in a population-based cross-sectional study. Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics, blood pressure, blood glucose, and lipid profiles were studied. Age-adjusted data for MS and cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed, and their relationships were examined. RESULTS: The age-adjusted prevalence of MS was 30.7% (males 30.5%; females 30.5%) using the NCEP definition, and 24.5% (males 19.2%, females 27.5%) using the IDF definition. The prevalence of MS using the NCEP definition was also higher in study participants with prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, HTN and CVD risk. The agreement rate between both definitions was 92% (k = 0.80). The NCEP definition had a stronger association with type 2 diabetes and HTN (odds ratio 12.4 vs 5.2; odds ratio 7.0 vs 4.7, respectively) than the IDF definition. However, the odds ratios for prediabetes and CVD risk were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MS was higher using the NCEP definition, and was more strongly associated with prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, HTN and CVD in this Bangladeshi population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhowmik et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk (prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease) (n=2,293). Modified NCEP ATP III definition of metabolic syndrome vs. IDF definition of metabolic syndrome was evaluated on Age-adjusted prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its association with type 2 diabetes and hypertension (OR 12.4 vs 5.2 for type 2 diabetes; OR 7.0 vs 4.7 for HTN). The modified NCEP definition identified a higher metabolic syndrome prevalence than the IDF definition and was more strongly associated with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: