Key result
BMI, waist circumference, and subscapular skinfold best identify clustered cardiometabolic risk factors.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,139)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Anthropometric indicators are associated with cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRF), but there is no consensus as to which indicator is the most suitable to screen for clustered CMRF. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of five anthropometric indicators to screen for clustered CMRF in children and adolescents. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in 1139 schoolchildren aged 6-17 years from Northeastern Brazil. Body weight, height, waist circumference (WC) and subscapular (SSF) and triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) were measured. Body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were calculated. The following CMRF were evaluated: elevated total cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high triglyceride concentration, hyperglycemia and high blood pressure. The participants were categorized into no CMRF, 1 CMRF, 2 CMRF and ≥3 CMRF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the accuracy of the anthropometric indicators in predicting CMRF for age group and sex. Results Poor associations were observed between the anthropometric indicators and 1 CMRF (accuracy of 0.49-0.64). The indicators showed moderate associations with 2 CMRF (accuracy of 0.57-0.75) and ≥3 CMRF (accuracy of 0.59-0.79). In general, TSF exhibited the worst performance in predicting CMRF, followed by WHtR. The highest accuracies were observed for BMI, WC and SSF, with no significant difference between these indicators. Conclusions The routine use of BMI, WC and SSF as epidemiological screening tools for clustered CMRF in childhood and adolescence should be encouraged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quadros et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Clustered cardiometabolic risk factors (n=1,139). Anthropometric indicators (BMI, waist circumference, subscapular skinfold, triceps skinfold, waist-to-height ratio) vs. No cardiometabolic risk factors (0 CMRF) was evaluated on Clustered cardiometabolic risk factors (1, 2, or ≥3 of: elevated total cholesterol, low HDL-C, elevated LDL-C, high triglycerides, hyperglycemia, high blood pressure) (ROC accuracy 0.59-0.79 for ≥3 CMRF). BMI, waist circumference, and subscapular skinfold showed the highest accuracy for screening clustered cardiometabolic risk factors (accuracy 0.59-0.79 for ≥3 CMRF).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: