Key result
IDF criteria offer the most convenient diagnostic standard for pediatric metabolic syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In recent years, there has been a greater concern about the presence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. However, there is no consensus regarding the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. It is evident that each component of the syndrome must be identified as early as possible in order to prevent definitive lesions. The question is how to do this and which cut-offs must be adopted for this diagnosis. For a matter of convenience, the definition chosen as the most appropriate is the one proposed by the IDF, with cut-offs fixed for pressure, lipids and glycemia, and abdominal circumference points assessed by percentile. Although on the one hand this definition could fail to include some children in the diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome, on the other hand, it would be of easier acceptance as it does not use multiple tables to assess several anthropometric and metabolic criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Márcio C. Mancini (2009) conducted a review in Metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. IDF diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome vs. Multiple-table anthropometric and metabolic criteria was evaluated on Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome. The IDF definition with fixed cut-offs and percentile-based waist circumference is proposed as the most convenient diagnostic standard for pediatric metabolic syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: