Why the study?
Does a rehabilitation program improve social functioning in elderly patients after hip fracture?
Does a rehabilitation program improve social functioning in elderly patients after hip fracture?
Rehabilitation significantly improves social functioning in elderly patients up to six months after hip fracture, across various degrees of musculoskeletal, neurological, and cognitive impairments.
Rehabilitation improves social functioning post-hip fracture across impairment severities; leaves open optimal tailoring for severe cognitive cases.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of rehabilitation treatment on social functioning in elderly patients after hip fracture during a rehabilitation program. METHODS: This study included 203 patients with hip fracture. Four groups were analyzed on rehabilitation: Group 1, at admission, Group 2, at discharge, Group 3, three months after discharge and Group 4, six months after discharge. The analyzed parameters included: musculoskeletal, neurological and cognitive impairments. Impairment severity was graded by cumulative index rating scale for geriatrics (CIRS-G). Evaluation of social functioning was completed by social functioning component (SFC) from quality of life (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in SF-36 SFC values for observed impairments from admission to six months after discharge for each severity degree (p<0.01), except for CIRS-G severity degree 4 for cognitive impairment, where significance was p<0.05. For the group of patients with musculoskeletal impairment, there was a significant difference between the values of SF-36 SFC concerning different severity degrees of CIRS-G only at six months after discharge (p<0.05). Patients with neurological or cognitive impairments have shown significant differences between the values of SF-36 SFC in regard to severity degrees of CIRS-G in all observational groups. CONCLUSION: .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radosavljevic et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: