Why the study?
Few studies have analyzed the real-world impact of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T rapid rule-out algorithms on outcomes and operations.
Does a 0/1-hour hsTnT-enabled algorithm reduce ED length of stay and 30-day return rates in patients presenting with chest pain compared to fourth-generation TnT?
Does a 0/1-hour hsTnT-enabled algorithm reduce ED length of stay and 30-day return rates in patients presenting with chest pain compared to fourth-generation TnT?
Implementation of a 0/1-hour hsTnT algorithm for ED chest pain presentations reduces ED length of stay and 30-day return rates compared to fourth-generation TnT.
May support hsTnT 0/1-h algorithms for select ED chest pain cases; leaves open broader outcome benefits.
OBJECTIVES: The analytical sensitivity of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) assays has enabled rapid myocardial infarction rule-out algorithms for emergency department (ED) presentations. Few studies have analyzed the real-world impact of hsTnT algorithms on outcomes and operations. METHODS: Comparison of ED length of stay (LOS) and 30-day outcomes (return to ED, inpatient admission, and mortality) for patients presenting with chest pain during 2 separate 208-day periods using a 0/1-hour hsTnT-enabled algorithm or fourth-generation TnT. RESULTS: Discharge, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality rates were not significantly different with fourth-generation TnT vs hsTnT. Thirty-day return rates were significantly decreased with hsTnT (17.4% vs 14.9%; P < .01). For encounters with TnT measured at least twice and resulting in discharge, median ED LOS decreased by 61 minutes with the use of hsTnT (488 vs 427 minutes; P < .0001). Median time between first and second TnT results decreased by 82 minutes with hsTnT (202 vs 120 minutes; P < .0001), suggesting that the 0/1-hour algorithm was incompletely adopted. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the hsTnT algorithm was associated with decreased 30-day return rates and decreased ED LOS for a subset of patients, despite incomplete adoption of the 0/1-hour algorithm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bevins et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: