Why the study?
To compare the effectiveness of various markers of myocardial injury (CK-MB, cTnI, hs-TnI, and H-FABP) in predicting the ACS course using the GRACE 2.0 score.
Does the inclusion of H-FABP in the GRACE 2.0 score predict outcomes as effectively as traditional markers of myocardial injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does the inclusion of H-FABP in the GRACE 2.0 score predict outcomes as effectively as traditional markers of myocardial injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
H-FABP performs similarly to traditional cardiac biomarkers when incorporated into the GRACE 2.0 score for risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome.
Findings should not yet alter ACS risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation of marker utility beyond GRACE 2.0.
Aim . To compare the effectiveness of various markers of myocardial injury (creatine phosphokinase MB-fraction (CK-MB), cardiac troponin I, measured by standard and high sensitivity methods (cTnI and hs-TnI), and heart-type fatty acids binding protein (H-FABP)) in predicting the ACS course using the GRACE 2.0 score. Methods . 183 patients with a verified diagnosis of ACS were included in the study. The levels of CK-MB, cTnl, hs-Tnl and H-FABP were measured at admission. Qualitative assessment of H-FABP was performed by immunochromatographic express-tests “CARD-INFO” and “CardioFABP”. Risk assessment of death in the in-hospital period and within the 12-months follow-up period, as well as death and/or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within the 12-months follow-up was estimated using the GRACE 2.0 score with alternate inclusion of the various cardiomarkers. The effectiveness of the resultant prognostic scales was evaluated using the ROC-analysis and comparison of the areas under the curve (AUC). Results . 114 patients (62.3%) were diagnosed with AMI and 69 (37.7%) with unstable angina. 10 patients (5.5%) died during the indexed hospitalization. Four patients died within the follow-up and 8 patients (4.4%) had Ami. 94 patients (51.3%) had elevated hs-Tnl levels at admission, 90 patients (49.2%) - cTnl, 45 patients (24.6%) - CK-MB. H-FABP levels were elevated in 70 (38.3%). The express-test “CARD-INFO” was positive in 86 patients (47.0%), the “CardioFABP” - in 125 (68.3%). There were no significant differences found between the stratification of ACS patients by the GRACE 2.0 score into high and non-high risk groups in terms of complications (p<0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences found between the AUC values of the cardiomarkers in terms of developing the endpoints using the GRACE 2.0 score (p<0.05). Conclusion . The introduction of H-FABP in the GRACE 2.0 scale is non-inferior to traditional markers of myocardial damage and may be used to stratify risk in patients with ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kokorin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: