Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Previously published factor VIII (FVIII) pharmacokinetic (PK)-based dosing approaches employ fixed infusion interval with a wide dose range that may lead to increased risk of bleeding, excessive doses or decreased health-related quality of life. AIM: The objectives of the study includes (i) personalizing infusion interval in lieu of fixed infusion, (ii) constraining dose within the range of 10-50 IU/kg and (iii) characterizing bleeding risk of PK-based dosing in comparison with empiric standard doses. METHODS: Patient demographics and PK parameters for conventional FVIII products were obtained from published literatures. Subject-specific PK parameters were derived from FVIII activities vs time data generated through simulation. RESULTS: Our data indicated approximately 4%, 38%, 37% and 20% of the subjects can be dosed with infusion interval of every 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours, respectively, for maintaining a target 1 IU/dL FVIII level within the dose range of 10-50 IU/kg. Maintaining an alternative trough value of 3 or 5 IU/dL requires more frequent infusion. The predicted median probability of bleeding risk per year was 35.7% (range, 11%-49%) for PK-based dosing maintaining 1 IU/dL. Predicted median bleeding risk was 37.9% (0%-74%), 32.8% (0%-72%) and 26.7% (0%-70%) for standard dosing of 20, 30 and 50 IU/kg, respectively. PK-based dosing resulted in a dose sparing benefit compared to standard dose of 30 or 50 IU/kg three times per week. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrate the feasibility of individualizing infusion interval, restricting FVIII dose, trough and peak concentration within an acceptable range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tegenge et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: