Key result
Daily haemophilia prophylaxis cuts factor costs by ~30% versus standard dosing, despite higher bleeding.
RCT (n=13)
Randomized crossover
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regular replacement therapy (prophylaxis) for haemophilia has been shown to prevent development of disabling arthropathy and to provide a better quality of life compared to treatment on demand; however, at a substantially higher cost. Calculations based on pharmacokinetic principles have shown that shortening dose intervals may reduce cost. The aim of this prospective, randomized, crossover pilot study was to address whether daily dosing is feasible, if it reduces concentrate consumption and is as effective in preventing bleeding as the standard prophylactic dosing regimen. In a 12+12 month crossover study, 13 patients were randomized to start either their own previously prescribed standard dose, or daily dosing adjusted to maintain at least the same trough levels as obtained with the standard dose. Ten patients completed the study. A 30% reduction in cost of factor concentrates was achieved with daily prophylaxis. However, the number of bleeding events increased in some patients in the daily dosing arm and patients reported decreased quality of life during daily prophylaxis. Daily treatment had a greater impact on daily life, and the patients found it more stressful.Prophylaxis with daily dosing may be feasible and efficacious in some patients. A substantial reduction of factor consumption and costs can be realized, but larger studies are needed before the introduction of daily prophylaxis into clinical routine can be recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindvall et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Haemophilia (n=13). Daily dosing factor replacement prophylaxis vs. Previously prescribed standard prophylactic dosing regimen was evaluated on Feasibility, factor concentrate consumption/cost, and bleeding prevention efficacy (30% cost reduction). Daily dosing prophylaxis for haemophilia reduced factor concentrate costs by 30% versus standard dosing, though bleeding events increased and quality of life decreased in some patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: