Why the study?
Although mtDNA haplogroup H is a reported susceptibility factor for HCM, the specific SNPs associated with the increased risk have not been identified.
Does the distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup H subhaplogroups differ between patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and controls?
Does the distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup H subhaplogroups differ between patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and controls?
The distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup H subhaplogroups, specifically a higher H3/H2 ratio, differs between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cases and controls, suggesting a subtle genetic susceptibility factor.
May suggest mtDNA haplogroup H involvement in HCM susceptibility; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter practice.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroup (hg) H has been reported as a susceptibility factor for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This was established in genetic association studies, however, the SNP or SNP’s that are associated with the increased risk have not been identified. Hg H is the most frequent European mtDNA hg with greater than 80 subhaplogroups (subhgs) each defined by specific SNPs. We tested the hypothesis that the distribution of H subhgs might differ between HCM patients and controls. The subhg H distribution in 55 HCM index cases was compared to that of two Danish mtDNA hg H control groups (n = 170 and n = 908, respectively). In the HCM group, H and 12 different H subhgs were found. All these, except subhgs H73, were also found in both control groups. The HCM group was also characterized by a higher proportion of H3 compared to H2. In the HCM group the H3/H2 proportion was 1.7, whereas it was 0.45 and 0.54 in the control groups. This tendency was replicated in an independent group of Hg H HCM index cases (n = 39) from Queensland, Australia, where the H3/H2 ratio was 1.5. In conclusion, the H subhgs distribution differs between HCM cases and controls, but the difference is subtle, and the understanding of the pathogenic significance is hampered by the lack of functional studies on the subhgs of H.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hagen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: